Try Another Version of This Question
Premise 1: The defendant has no alibi for the night of the theft.
Premise 2: The stolen goods were found in the defendant’s possession.
Premise 3: Two witnesses have identified the defendant as the thief.
Conclusion: The defendant is guilty of theft.
Decide whether the above argument is inductive or deductive.
If the above argument is inductive, decide if it is strong or weak. Select not applicable if the argument is deductive.
If the above argument is deductive, decide if it is valid or invalid. Select not applicable if the argument is inductive.
Box 1: Select the best answer
Box 2: Select the best answer
Box 3: Select the best answer